Minimizing complications following preperitoneal transinguinal herniorrhaphy with modified Kugel mesh: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial
van Veen, RN et al. Randomized clinical trial of primary inguinal hernia repair with mesh versus without mesh: long-term chronic pain at 10 years. Operation 142(5), 695–698 (2007).
Google Scholar
Beets, GL, Oosterhuis, KJ, Go, PMNYH, Baeten, CGMI & Kootstra, G. Long-term follow-up (12-15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini-Stetten, Should ice, aqnd High ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for the primary repair of inguinal hernias. Jam. Coll. Surg. 185352–7 (1997).
Google Scholar
Koning, GG et al. Randomized clinical trial of chronic pain after the transinguinal preperitoneal technique compared to the Lichtenstein method for the repair of inguinal hernias. Br. J. Surg. 99(10), 1365–1373 (2012).
Google Scholar
Koning, GG et al. Correction of transinguinal preperitoneal hernia vs Lichtenstein technique; is the top TIPP?. Hernia 15(1), 19–22 (2011).
Google Scholar
Koning, GG et al. The Tilburg double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing inguinal hernia repair according to Lichtenstein and the transinguinal preperitoneal technique. Trials ten89 (2009).
Google Scholar
Reinpold, WM, Nehls, J. & Eggert, A. Nerve management and chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a two-phase prospective study. Ann. Surg. 254(1), 163-168 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hirose, T. et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing light versus heavy mesh for mesh plug repair of primary inguinal hernia. Hernia 18(2), 213–219 (2014).
Google Scholar
O’Dwyer, PJ et al. Randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of light or heavy mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br. J. Surg. 92(2), 166–170 (2005).
Google Scholar
Brown, CN & Finch, JG Which mesh for hernia repair?. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. English 92272–278 (2010).
Google Scholar
Chiang, HC et al. Outcomes of inguinal hernia repair using the modified Kugel patch without the optional onlay patch: a case series of 163 consecutive patients. Hernia 19(3), 437–42 (2014).
Google Scholar
Nienhuijs, S., van Oort, I., Keemers-Gels, ME, Strobbe, LJA, and Rosman, C. Randomized clinical trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair, and the Lichtenstein method for open repair of the inguinal hernia. Br. J. Surg. 9233–38 (2005).
Google Scholar
Neumayer, L. et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of an inguinal hernia. N.Engl. J.Med. 350(18), 1819–1827 (2004).
Google Scholar
Suva, K. et al. Modified Kugel herniorrhaphy using a standardized dissection technique of the preperitoneal space: long-term operative outcome in 340 consecutive patients with inguinal hernia. Hernia 17699-707 (2013).
Google Scholar
Azeem, M., Ullha, Z., Gorya, S., Bashir, A., and Arshad Cheem, M. Modified kugel versus lichtenstein operation for inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized study. APMC 9117–123 (2015).
Google Scholar
Li, J., Ji, Z., and Cheng, T. Comparison of open preperitoneal and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. A m. J. Surg. 204769–778 (2012).
Google Scholar
Li, J., Ji, Z. & Li, Y. Comparison of hook-and-loop mesh and sutured mesh in the repair of an open inguinal hernia: the results of the meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. 259(6), 1080-1085 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kebapcı, E., Ozturk, S. & Unver, M. Results of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic repair of a clinically occult inguinal hernia diagnosed by ultrasound. POL PRZEGL CHIR 93(4), 11–14 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nahm, C. et al. Aspiration test to demonstrate the peritoneal edge during laparoscopic repair of an extraperitoneal inguinal hernia. Surg. Endoc. 274360–3 (2013).
Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, B., van den Broek, J. & Dwars, BJ The incidence and natural history of occult inguinal hernias during TAPP repair. Surg. Endoc. 274142–4146 (2013).
Google Scholar
Henriksen, NA, Thorup, J. & Jorgensen, LN Unsuspected femoral hernia in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of recurrent inguinal hernia. Hernia 16381–385 (2012).
Google Scholar
Shakil, A. et al. Inguinal hernias: diagnosis and management. A m. Family Doctor 102(8), 487–92 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gutlic, N., Rogmark, P., Nordin, P., Petersson, U. & Montgomery, A. Impact of mesh fixation on chronic pain in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia (EPT) repair: A national study based on a register. Ann. Surg. 263(6), 1199-1206 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bendavid, R. et al. A mesh-related post-herniorrhaphy neuralgia mechanism. Hernia 20(3), 357–365 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zanoni, M. et al. Wide nerve section to prevent postoperative inguinodynia after repair of a prosthetic hernia: a monocentric experience. Hernia 19(4), 565-570 (2015).
Google Scholar
Halle, M. et al. Risk factors for reoperation due to chronic inguinal post-herniorrhaphy pain. Hernia 19(6), 863–9 (2015).
Google Scholar
Arslan, K. et al. Minimally invasive preperitoneal monolayer mesh repair versus standard Lichtenstein hernia repair for inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized trial. Hernia 19(3), 373-381 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nienhuijs, S., Staal, E., Keemers-Gels, M., Rosman, C., and Strobbe, L. Pain after open preperitoneal repair compared with lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial. World J. Surg. 311751–1757 (2007).
Google Scholar
Nienhuijs, S. et al. Chronic pain after mesh repair of an inguinal hernia: a systematic review. A m. J. Surg. 194(3), 394–400 (2007).
Google Scholar
Mitura, K. et al. Factors influencing symptoms of inguinal hernia and preoperative evaluation of symptoms by patients: results of a prospective study including 1647 patients. Hernia 22585–91 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mitura, K. et al. The change in groin pain perception after repair of a transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia with glue fixation: a prospective trial from the experience of a single surgeon. Surg. Endoc. 324284–9 (2018).
Google Scholar
Iftikhar, N. & Kerawala, AA Quality of life after inguinal hernia repair. Pol. Przegl Chir. 93(3), 1–5 (2021).
Google Scholar
Huang, C.-C. et al. Quality of life of patients with inguinal hernia in Taiwan: the application of the hernia-specific quality of life assessment instrument. PLOS ONE 12(8), e0183138 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mitura, K. & Garnysz, K. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein repair versus Valenti technique for inguinal hernia. Hernia 23547–54 (2019).
Google Scholar
Manangi, M., Shivashankar, S. & Vijayakumar, A. Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair (International Scholarly Search Opinion, 2014).
Google Scholar
Mier, N. et al. Preoperative pain in a patient with an inguinal hernia predicts long-term quality of life. Operation 163578–81 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wright, R. et al. Why do inguinal hernia patients have pain? Histology suggests compressive neuropathy. A m. J. Surg. 213975e82 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liem, MS et al. Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for the repair of inguinal hernias. N.Engl. J.Med. 3361541–7 (1997).
Google Scholar
Schmedt, CG, Sauerland, S. & Bittner, R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures with Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg. Endoc. 19(2), 188–199 (2005).
Google Scholar
Dedemadi, G. et al. Laparoscopic repair versus open mesh for recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of results. A m. J. Surg. 200(2), 291-297 (2010).
Google Scholar
Comments are closed.